Katie Mathison, FPRINZ, PRINZ Central Committee member
The move by the New Zealand Herald to “help relaunch … and help run” the FYI website is an interesting one, but why have they done it?
If you had to guess why a news outlet has bothered getting into a website where people can file OIA (Official Information Act) requests and get responses published, you’d probably say that they’re positioning themselves as the media champion of the OIA. And in the process getting one over on their competitors and drawing in more readers and advertisers.
The Herald, like all journalists, sees the OIA as a way to get news fodder. But the Herald clearly also sees the OIA as a news item in itself. Witness the Herald’s own commentary on the ‘relaunch’, in which they reference the Ombudsman’s current review, and requoting PM John Key’s “Sometimes we wait the 20 days because, in the end, Government might take the view that’s in our best interest to do that”.
So what changes? Apparently nothing. Where is the competitive advantage? Apparently nowhere, unless the Herald decides to delay posting OIA responses on FYI, so that they get first dibs on making comment before their competitors see it. And therein lies the rub. We have an independent, free-spirited public website that carries the .org (not-for-profit) suffix coming under the control of a profit-making news company with a .co suffix. Is this what the New Zealand public wants from FYI? Basically users will now submit their OIA requests to the Herald, which is weird whichever way you think about it.
But maybe there’s not enough people who will care: in the six plus years FYI has been up and running only 1256 requesters have used it, averaging about one request a day. It will be interesting to see how the Herald manages to convert that to profit.
In the interests of full disclosure, I work for a central government agency that is one of the 12 selected for the Ombudsman’s review.