Reaching the hard-to-reach: Census 2013

17 Apr

Being responsible PR people, we all heard the census campaign messages and dutifully filled in our forms on census day. But what about those New Zealanders who can’t be bothered, don’t have as strong a sense of civic responsibility, feel threatened by the census, object to it, can’t read it, or don’t speak English? Kerry Lamont, from Statistics New Zealand, presented to PRINZ Central Division members on this question at the April PR Breakfast session at the Wellington Club.

The 2011 census was cancelled because of the Christchurch earthquake, and while this made it all the more important to have as many New Zealanders as possible participate in the 2013 census, it also provided the opportunity to review the communications that were originally planned for the 2011 census. With the lag in data, getting the hard-to-reach groups to participate had become all the more important, as the census needs to provide an accurate picture of all social sectors of New Zealand so that future services such as health and education can be planned out.

So, when Statistics New Zealand reviewed its preparation for the 2011 census, it made some changes to bring a sharper focus onto getting the hard-to-reach groups to participate. The other significant strategy made possible by the time lag was a big push to get the general public to complete their census on line, which would perhaps reduce the need for repeated face-to-face visits in future censuses.

The hard-to-reach sectors are Maori, Pacific Island, Asian, Chinese, and young people. Privacy can be a big concern among these groups, and they are less likely to participate if they believe that their information will be shared across government. So one of the messages was that in fact the census is one of the very few government data-collecting activities where personal information will not be shared between departments, for that very reason.

One of the key tactics employed to reach the hard-to-reach groups was a paid network of over 20 community liaison people who could wield influence in their communities. Kerry emphasised that it is vital to find good people to do this work, of the right level and age to get into the community and influence, and it is well worth spending a lot of time on your recruitment process to get the right ones. She described a criteria ‘sieve’ that each person had to pass through to make the grade, including: is respected; has a track record of initiating change in a community; is influential with the hard-to-reach group; is well networked; is able to translate key messages; and has high personal commitment to the census.

Kerry observed that it is more effective to have separate liaison people for Maori and Pacific Island groups. She added that if you get the right people to do liaison, there’s not such an issue with koha.

Kerry said that the community liaison network did not need to be micro-managed and it was better to let them go off and do their jobs, and just to support them with the paperwork. Some wanted more control over media and advertising, but Kerry said she was not prepared to do this, although she would not rule it out in future. She ensured they all got media training, and she set clear boundaries as to what they could and could not respond to in the media.

The community liaison network worked well, reaching 1.1 million otherwise hard-to-reach New Zealanders.

One interesting tactic was a video-booth tent at Waitangi, where people could go in to record their views on the census. The video was then used on YouTube.

Migrant groups can also have different education levels and language barriers, making completing a census form somewhat of a challenge for them. Marketing material was translated into 27 languages, bringing its own challenges in terms of accuracy. Kerry commented that with this many translations, you have to accept that you’ll never get everything 100% right.

Kerry said that her team of seven steered clear of going to events to promote the census, on the basis that the investment is quite large, and people at the event are more interested in food and entertainment than in talking to government.

Social media was a large focus for the young hard-to-reach group. Kerry said that this group spans all cultures and backgrounds, as young people tend to define themselves as ‘young’ first, and then what culture they are second.

The youth strategy for 2011 performed badly when it was tested three years on, so changes were made. In particular, the radio campaign did not test so well, so it was canned. By 2013, the ad agency had a younger team who were more able to capture successfully 90% of the 800,000 young New Zealanders who are on Facebook.

For this younger audience, Statistics NZ focussed on getting just one simple message across: do your census online. A Facebook page with a ‘street art’ look was created. Sponsorship and competitions with modest prizes were used to push people to the page. People could chat to each other. Regional results were posted on a map, and comments were published in a graffiti style along with the person’s Facebook picture.

Kerry said that they reached 500% engagement for Facebook:

Engagement = users talking

                        fans

 Statistics NZ forged a partnership with TNVZ U Channel to promote the census to youth in a very cost-effective way. The hosts talked about the census, announced prizewinners, and plugged the Facebook page. Kerry said it is a great channel for youth engagement.

In the past, youth ambassadors have been used, but Kerry said she opted not to this time, as they are tricky to manage and have limited impact, not having the maturity to access communities at the right level in order to access their youth members in turn.

In summary, Kerry said that getting the right team together – both in-house and as a community liaison network was the key to a successful census campaign.

PRINZ central members are now looking forward to the May PRINZ conference in Christchurch, and the evening Parliamentary event on 5 June where the longest-serving MPs meet the newer ones to debate their experiences of PR and lobbying.

Write-up by Katie Mathison FPRiNZ

 

Finance for comms – not rocket science but essential PD

10 Apr

By Dan Ormond, Ideas Shop

Being the commerce graduate working in an industry of arts and communications graduates, I often find myself being the ‘go to’ person for finance and accounting issues.  This is not only for internal finances here at Ideas Shop, but also for the interpretation of client annual results and other finance PR.  Many in our industry have a mental block when presented with tables of figures and just see the numbers rather than what they mean.    

We all need an understanding of the structure and language of accounting, whether it is to provide advice to listed clients on their investor relations, or government clients on consumer trends. We need to be able to understand and interpret the information.

But it’s not “rocket science”, especially not at the level we are required to operate at 90% of the time.  The fundamentals of reading a balance sheet, cash flow and profit and loss statement are not difficult to understand – but it does take understanding to interpret the meaning and consequence on the business or organisation.

Knowing enough to ask the right questions is vital at the early stages of our careers. Building on this knowledge through experience so we can contribute to the active management of the business is also crucial.     

Being a director of a company, as I hope we all aspire to become, you have a statutory obligation to understand the financial information you are presented with.  This is obviously something that directors of a few failed finance companies should have been more aware of at the time.   

This ½ day of learning will give you, as a communicator or PR leader, the fundamentals of business financials, enabling you to gain a deeper understanding of your business and that of your client (internal or external).

Register for ‘Finance Fundamentals – For Communicators” on 18 April in Wellington and on 1 May in Auckland.  

Meet the Media – More than just the Do’s and Don’t's

5 Mar

By Brenda Newth, PR Partners

Auckland PRINZ members were treated to an event rarer than the return of Halley’s Comet when four of the most respected and senior journalists working in New Zealand gave us their view on modern media relations.

Ably led by chair Nevil Gibson, the panellists – Fiona Rotherham, Lesley Deverall, Fiona Macmillan and Jeremy Rees - offered a sneak peek into their newsrooms and were frank about the challenges facing their industry, and by association, PR practitioners and their clients.

Here are the key outtakes from each speaker – and if you’d like to hear more, check out the podcast on the PRINZ website (available to members only).

Fiona Rotherham, Managing Editor, Fairfax Business Bureau

Fiona Rotherham, Managing Editor, Fairfax Business Bureau

Fiona Rotherham

Fairfax’s business model means that the same reporter will write for online and the hard copy papers in the Fairfax stable. Pitching to individual journalists is effective, but remember, it still has to get past the editor!

With pressure on headcount, journalists are busy – therefore a “heads up” about an upcoming story is a good tactic as it allows the journalist to think about how best to cover the story.The Sunday paper needs exclusives, they are not going to give the news of the week another airing unless it is a big story with multiple angles.

Fiona was kind enough to reference her and her team’s pet hates, and there is a list of dos and don’ts plus some pearls of wisdom available on the PRINZ website (available to members only).

The big trend identified is fragmentation of the media – people are going to multiple places to get their news, therefore having credible journalists that people can trust to get the story has never been more important.

Lesley Deverall

Lesley Deverall, Chief Reporter, Newstalk ZB

Lesley Deverall, Chief Reporter, Newstalk ZB

Talked about the fast-paced world of radio news.

Like its print cousins, the Radio Network is adapting to change. Its team of 40 journalists (majority based in Auckland) cover both national and local stories, preparing content for bulletins that start at 5.30am and run through to midnight.The biggest bulletins of the day are 6am, 7am and 8am, follows by the afternoon peaks of 4pm and 5pm. Newstalk journalists post additional content to the website – with much longer articles and quotes than the shorter pieces that go to air.

We got some real insights into the on-going relevance of radio in the aftermath of the Christchurch earthquakes. With power supplies disrupted, the car radio was often the only way that Cantabrians could keep up to date with what had happened in the earthquake and the response of emergency services.

Don’t call either just before or just after a news bulletin.

Fiona MacMillan

Shared the vision for TV3’s Firstline breakfast news programme, which is “smart news for grown-ups”. Breakfast TV viewers are “news snackers” they will have the TV on in the background while they get ready. The show is trying to encourage more sustained viewingThe show does on average 10 interviews each day, which means that it’s a content-hungry beast, with an appetite for the best interviews. There are news bulletins every half hour. The show has just celebrated its second birthday, and has about 350,000 viewers each week.

The show’s producers appreciate long lead times and smart pitches. It is always best to know the basics of the show – its name, the host’s name and its format – before you call, otherwise your pitch will fail before you have even started. Calling the day before or late on a Friday, won’t win you any friends.

Jeremy Rees

Jeremy Rees, Online Editor in Chief, APN

Jeremy Rees, Online Editor in Chief, APN

Introduced us to the “five ages of online news”, which described how online news is changing. Once it was a race for eyeballs, now it is about finding something unique that will deliver value and engage the audience.The five ages of online news:

1. Come to the platform –the early days
2. The drive for eyeballs – amassing the audience
3. The race for value – unique content that people are engaged with
4. Get the balance right – the commercial model
5. Fragmentation – huge audiences reading at different times, having additional deeper content available

Like Fiona Rotherham before him, Jeremy too, hinted that paid online news content is not far away.

Thank you PR Partners for organising this event.

PRINZ Awards 2013 Facebook LiveChat

27 Feb

By PRINZ Office

On Mondauntitledy 18 February 2013, the 39th Annual PRINZ Awards opened. PRINZ Chief Judge Anna Radford, Chief Executive Simone Bell and Awards Coordinator Rebecca Foote came together via Live Chat on Facebook to answer members’ burning questions about the 2013 Awards, from new categories to entry format. To view the LiveChat on Facebook, click here.

 

Q: Just wondering if we have to submit the entry in your form template – or can we provide it in our own format as long as the questions are clearly stated and it’s within the word count?

A: Please submit the entry in the PRINZ online form. The online form is important for our judging process and also avoids any application compatibility issues.

 

Q: This question is in regards to the new rule that we can only enter into one category – does PRINZ have a person that we could talk to that could provide advice on which category might be best for our entry if we are unsure?

A: We would be happy to help you decide which category is most appropriate. Just email Rebecca at the PRINZ Office, membership@prinz.org.nz.

 

Q: Can the details of a winning entry remain confidential at the client’s request? I.e. just print the summary and not the full detail in the case studies handbook?

A: Yes.

 

Q: Can we enter the launch of a new campaign in the Marketing Communications – Integrated category? Ours has elements of advertising, marketing, PR as well as digital.

A: Yes, but it is important to check that your entry meets the category’s criteria and is the best fit. You also may wish to consider the Special Event or Project Category instead.

 

Q: What if it is a launch of an advertising campaign that is well supported by PR and digital?

A: When deciding on which category to enter, rather than focusing on what you are launching, look at how you are launching it and the extent to which it meets the criteria for the category you are considering. Feel free to get in touch if you are still unsure.

 

Q: Can we enter the special event/project category for the work we did as sponsors of an event (as opposed to organisers)?

A: It is difficult to provide an accurate answer without having more information.

If this question applies to you, please contact the office to discuss.

 

Tip from Anna: Judges are looking for high professional standards in entries and will deduct marks for spelling and grammatical errors. PRINZ suggests always getting your entry proof-read and peer-reviewed. Before submitting an entry, ask yourself: would I send this to a client?

 

Q: What would be the most important piece of advice you would give to people entering the awards this year?

A: It is important to clearly articulate objectives rather than tactics (judges are looking for SMART objectives). These are Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic and Time-Bound. It is also important to be thorough when completing the Evaluation and Follow Up section (remember this is worth 15 marks). In this section judges are looking for what the next steps are, e.g. post-testing, evaluating results and future plans.

 

Q: Will you be holding an Awards workshop like last year?  I’m interested in entering, but I’ve never entered before and I’d love some guidance.

A: This year we are providing guidance through this live chat. We do have the Top Ten Tips from last year’s workshop if you would like to view them here.

 

For more information about the 2013 PRINZ Awards, click here.

How often do you hear Obama, Air NZ and PRINZ in the same sentence?

14 Feb

Rebecca Foote, PRINZ Comms Advisor for membership hosted two lucky ticket winners (and PRINZ members) at the recent Air New Zealand Social Media Breakfast with Teddy Goff and Ross Dawson – and here’s her blog from the event.

Teddy Goff, Digital Director of Barack Obama’s 2008 and 20012 election campaigns.

Ross Dawson, an Australian author, futurist and entrepreneur. Dawson is most famous for writing Living Networks (2002) – predicting the social networking revolution.

Air New Zealand’s Social Media Breakfast was a display of social media at its best. Teddy Goff spoke about the extensive use of social media in the last two election campaigns. Air New Zealand’s opening video highlighted the success of the Flying Social Network, the centre of the company’s social media activity.

It is not a new idea that social media is here to stay. Ross Dawson’s presentation reassured us that social media is going to become even more important. Yet companies still fear what they don’t know, and social media can seem like unchartered territory for those who have never dived in before.

But if this Breakfast screamed anything it was: BE BRAVE!

Obama and his digital team were BRAVE. To put the President of the United States on social media to answer questions, take criticism and get feedback for all the world to see is a leap of faith. Politics divides America into Red and Blue. Opinions are held strongly, shared freely, and discussions can turn very quickly. Most of all, the openness and freedom of social media is at odds with the idea of politicians operating behind closed doors.

The Obama social media campaign had three key goals: to fundraise money for the election campaign, to register people to vote, and to get people to vote for Obama. Teddy outlined a few key principles of the digital effort:

  •  Even online, people still want to be engaged, have a relationship, and be liked
  • People don’t like politics or political rhetoric, but they trust their friends
  • About 98% of Americans can be reached through the 34 million fans of Barack Obama on Facebook
  • Don’t be lame, tell real stories.

The campaign fundraised over US$600million and registered 1 million to vote. And we know the result.

According to Goff, its success is no surprise. The public had an opportunity to engage with a President who freely answers questions on Reddit, shares family photos on Facebook, and is up with the latest on Twitter. Obama met with the people, in their world (albeit a virtual one), gave them the time of day, and developed a relationship with them.

Public relations, at its core, is about relationships and engagement, and social media provides an excellent platform to achieve these objectives. The principle stays the same, only the tool and channel is different.

The breakfast’s tone and content brought to mind my experience at the recent PRINZ PR Summer Camp, where PRINZ trainer Catherine Arrow said that the most important trait a PR practitioner can have is courage. I am sure Teddy Goff would agree.

If you’d like to get more knowledge, experience or strategic nous when it comes to online, take a look at the courses offered by PRINZ, there is something to suit everyone from trend spotting, to playing with the tools, a full immersion Social Media bootcamp and thinking strategically. Take a look here for courses from Feb – May 2013.

Apostrophe crimes – laying down the law

11 Feb

By Geraldine Johns

It’s normal practice to take a carry bag when you go to the fruit and vege shop. But often a visit leaves me wishing I’d taken something else as well: some blackboard paint.

Likewise, to walk past any real estate agency is to cause irritation of teeth-grating proportions – and it’s got nothing to do with the price of the houses on offer.

Don’t start me on restaurants. Menus are riddled with evidence of sins so great they put you off your meal.

They’re called apostrophe crimes. They leap out when you least expect them, and even when you see them coming, they still horrify.

The crime of the apostrophe takes something of a scatter-gun approach. It’s like whoever has written the piece decides at the end it needs a bit of titivation. So they just hurl a few at random – normally when there’s a spare ‘s’ lurking about.

To add to the spectacle there’s the randomisation of capitals crime – again, applied with little forethought. And just for that finishing effect, why not throw in a few exclamation marks? Key offenders here are those catalogues that appear uninvited in your letterbox; also CD shops.

Such crimes – in isolation or combined – can really give you the shudders. And although they might be laughed off in a retail sense, apostrophe catastrophes, together with their exclamation and capitialisation siblings, certainly take on graver proportions in a formal document.  

These things scream at the trained eye. So to see a lapse in a professional piece submitted for consideration can only spark suspicion: what else is wrong with the content? If the author can’t get their punctuation right, what else have they failed to check for accuracy?

The thing about punctuation crime is it’s so simple to fix. There are only a few rules and they are fairly easy to apply. It’s unfortunate that, rather than take responsibility themselves, the authors of such misfortune blame spell check. Or a busy day. There really is no excuse, other than the fact that somebody didn’t pay sufficient attention.

Journalist and trainer Geraldine Johns will run two PRINZ courses in March on media relations, including short sessions on spelling and grammar as part of the day. Click here for course information and to register.

Sponsorship, Partnership, Philanthropy: What’s the difference and why should I care?

14 Jan
Peugeot and special guests play in the CureKids charity golf tournament at The Hills

Peugeot and special guests play in the CureKids charity golf tournament at The Hill

By Kathy Cunningham, Empire PR & Events

While speaking with Grant Smith, General Manager for Sime Darby Automobiles NZ who distributes Peugeot and who are one of my clients, I was interested in learning about why he has made the decision to sponsor two very different organisations. His responses made sense. He also motivated me to do a bit more research on why companies sponsor, partner or donate.

Here’s why you should care about what you and your company sponsor.

“It’s all about brand fit and delivering value to both parties,” explains Grant Smith. “That along with providing our customers with a money can’t buy experience is what we at Peugeot care about.”

But that’s not all. As Grant continues, he explains that he and Peugeot also want to make a difference in the world and change the perception of the brand by making it accessible. Partnering with The New Zealand Ballet and CureKids has allowed them to do just that.

“Peugeot dealers in Wellington and Auckland have the chance to invite customers and special guests to attend the opening night of a NZ Ballet performance, and then go to an exclusive event with the dancers and choreographers. If we were not a partner, we could not do this.”

Grant Smith, GM with CureKids CEO and Ambassadors (Museum)

Grant Smith, GM with CureKids CEO and Ambassadors (Museum)

So, is this a partnership, sponsorship or just a donation?

“This is a partnership since we provide value to the NZ Ballet by providing Peugeot vehicles and the NZ Ballet provides value to us by giving our customers the royal treatment each time they attend a performance.”

But, isn’t this what sponsorship is all about? A win-win situation? Well, not according to the Director of Forward Thinking, Ray Comeau who believes that when he ‘sponsors’ an event, he achieves a specific marketing goal – say, reaching an audience he would not have had the chance to. But, when he enters into a ‘partnership’ agreement, it is long term (3 to 10 years) and expects to receive more than a sponsor.

I’m not convinced by Ray with his philosophy, so I did more research!

Kim Skildum Reid is a recognised expert in sponsorship and believes in a win-win-win situation. It is a win for the sponsor, the organisation and most importantly for the consumer. Now, this I like since for a very long time we have taught and implemented the win-win scenario. With the end user now in the forefront of our thinking, it has made sponsorship a whole lot more interesting.

If you want to learn about the win-win-win scenario as well as a case study on the Peugeot partnership with CureKids and The New Zealand Ballet, please register today for the PRINZ Events; Strategy, Sponsorship and Crisis Management course. Details here.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: